Canada’s federal government has now formally listed Samidoun as a terrorist entity, effective Oct. 11.
“Violent extremism, acts of terrorism or terrorist financing have no place in Canadian society or abroad. The listing of Samidoun as a terrorist entity under the Criminal Code sends a strong message that Canada will not tolerate this type of activity, and will do everything in its power to counter the ongoing threat to Canada’s national security and all people in Canada,” read the Tuesday morning statement from public safety minister Dominic LeBlanc.
The decision was formally announced as a joint action with the U.S. Department of the Treasury, which called Samidoun “a sham charity” in a statement from its Office of Foreign Assets Control.
Jewish leaders had been arguing the Vancouver-based non-profit organization has direct ties to known militant terrorist entities including the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine, (PFLP) which pioneered airplane hijackings, suicide bombings and assassinations of Israelis, and were directly involved in the Oct. 7 attacks on Israel.
Last week, Pierre Poilievre, the leader of the federal Conservatives, demanded Ottawa declare Samidoun a terrorist organization—as several other countries have already done. Doing so would block Samidoun’s ability to fundraise and would make it a crime for anyone to help it.
The PFLP is outlawed in Canada, the U.S., the U.K., Germany, Israel and many other countries, and some countries including Germany and Israel have banned Samidoun, too. The Netherlands has voted to consider doing the same.
Samidoun’s status in Canada fell under scrutiny after the group organized protests to coincide with the anniversary of Oct. 7. Some supporters in Vancouver tried to set fire to a Canadian flag, calling, “Death to Canada, death to U.S.A., and death to Israel.”
Meanwhile, authorities in British Columbia were forced to lift bail conditions that had prevented Samidoun’s Vancouver-based director, Charlotte Kates, from participating in any protests for a period of six months. Vancouver police arrested Kates in April after she gave an antisemitic speech that praised the Oct. 7 massacre. But charges had not yet been laid before the bail deadline expired on Oct. 8. Kates is married to Khaled Barakat, suspected of being a high-ranking member of the PFLP, who also was granted Canadian citizenship.
Gerald Steinberg founded the pro-Israel research institute NGO Monitor, and is a professor emeritus at Bar Ilan University. A former columnist for this publication, he spoke to The CJN Daily host Ellin Bessner earlier this month to explain more about Samidoun’s terrorist ties, including how they operate on Canadian campuses.
Gerald Steinberg: I stumbled into the world of NGOs, non-governmental organizations, about 20 years ago when Canada was one of the main funders of something called the UN Conference on the Elimination of Racism around the world. That’s called the infamous Durban Conference. A lot of antisemitism there. They didn’t care about racism. It was about labeling Israel as an apartheid, genocide state. That was in September 2001. Twenty-three years ago. And I began to see non-governmental organizations as important players and nobody was looking at that. Why are they allowed to be? What is the reason that they have gained so much political influence? And I began to do research. We look at the impact, the capabilities, the funding… the NGO world does that’s related primarily to Israel. We do look at some other cases, for comparative purposes.
Samidoun was not high up on our radar. Samidoun was something that gradually we began to understand the importance of. It’s officially called the Palestinian Prisoner Solidarity Network.
They’re a branch, as they make quite clear, and unusually clear, of the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine, which is a banned terror organization in the United States, in a number of European countries, in the UK and elsewhere. So what is this organization doing? Organizing these kinds of rallies and mob actions that label Israel as a genocidal state and call for the destruction of Israel, as we’ve seen around the world. And, as I began to look further and further into them, the Canadian connection became more dominant.
It wasn’t always like that. Samiduon operated out of Germany for a number of years. Khaled Barakat, who was the head of Samidoun, lived in Germany and, partly or significantly because of the work that NGO Monitor did vis-a-vis the German government, and we said ‘Look, they’re a terrorist front. Israel has officially labeled them a terrorist front and the evidence is clear. They’re connected to the PFLP.’ The Germans then expelled Khaled Barakat and made Samidoun unable to function in Germany. They are banned. They can’t raise money. They can’t hold rallies. They can’t do anything in Germany.
There are other countries in Europe that are at some level looking at this, and have restricted their capabilities. Belgium is one of them. In Canada, they’re operated out of Vancouver, where Charlotte Kates lives. Basically they went from Germany to Vancouver. Both Cates and Khaled Barakat, the two people who run Samidoun, are Canadian citizens. We don’t know anything really about how they became citizens or what they said in their application. Did they claim refugee status? At least did he claim refugee status as a Palestinian who left Israel and is labeled as a terrorist agent by Israel?
So Canada’s become the base of operations. And the question is, how did that happen? And what are Canadians doing about that? And then we began to look more and more at this network.
It’s important to understand that Samidoun is a worldwide network. They have branches that run anti-Israel public events, vicious anti-Israel public events, and recruit people and raise money in Brazil and other countries in South America, throughout Europe. They have operations in the United States. The United States has not banned them.
Spain is a prominent place where they operate. So we mapped for the first time Samidoun’s international operations. And then the question comes up: Who funds them?
Now, it has come up, particularly since Oct. 7, in the U.S. Congress. And just as there is a process in Canada, there is also a process in the United States, although less acute, because they are based out of Vancouver and not in the US.
Ellin Bessner: What evidence has your NGO monitor seen of what they’ve actually been doing here?
GS: The evidence is clear to everybody. You see the rallies that they are organizing. You see their posters. You see their events. I see a lot of them in Vancouver, and I’ve talked to a number of people in Vancouver, and the Jewish community feels the threat there. They’ve had some very violent demonstrations in the last year…I call them mob violence.
So they’re quite visible and they’ve also had visibility in Toronto, I think in Montreal as well. They are on campuses where there are encampments, [and you see] Samidoun flags, Samidoun posters, and there is a Samidoun presence. That’s throughout North America, both in the United States and in Canada. So they’re very visible.
EB: What are the benefits to them of operating in Canada?
GS: Well, they have citizenship. I’m not sure the Khaled Barakat would have gotten any kind of resident status in the United States. I think the rules for entry are tighter in the U.S. if there is a possible terror connection. I think maybe that’s understated, but I’ll let you deal with that. So being in Canada as citizens gives them protection, gives them a place to operate from.
EB: And obviously that’s important for an organization like this. How much money do they get? And where does it come from?
GS: We have no idea. Either question. Because of the PFLP connection, because they run a lot of events, because this is what they live off of. There are other people as well, but Barakat and Charlotte Kates are the two most visible ones. This is their life. so therefore, they must be drawing salaries. They must be able to get funding, and there’s probably more. Plus, they do a lot of traveling.
And maybe the Iranian government paid for Charlotte Kates to go to Tehran to do what she just did. It’s most likely. But they could be getting money from Qatar. There’s a lot of speculation. The United States members of Congress have put Samidoun as well as Students for Justice in Palestine and a few other groups on a sort of watch list. And they’ve asked the Internal Revenue Service, which is the equivalent of the Canada Revenue Agency, to provide that information that up until now Samidoun and other organizations have been allowed to hide their anonymous donors. But it must be a significant amount of money to be able to pay for all these activities and their salaries and everything else.
EB You mentioned the trip to Iran, we should remind our audience that the Iranian government issued an award on state television to Charlotte Kates, who had to wear a hijab over her hair to appear on television, in order to get some kind of prize. And so she went and she was talking about how she was arrested in Canada, in Vancouver, in April. And they were glorifying the words that she had said on the steps of the Art Gallery of Vancouver. Do you want to remind us of some of the things they have been quoted as saying that your NGO monitor has kept track of?
GS: If we’re looking even in the last year, the very virulent attacks against Israel, against the right of Israel to exist, has been a repeated theme on all, including what we heard from Kates in Tehran, what they call the right of resistance. And particularly, they make it very specific that they use the term that Hamas used, the Flood of al-Aqsa resistance operation.
And they condemned “The Zionist retaliatory strikes against Palestinian civilians in Gaza.” This is from Oct. 10, 2023. Just one example of many others. They talk about repeatedly the right of the Palestinians, the brave Palestinian people and their resistance movement, stop the Israeli genocide of Palestinians, support Palestinian resistance and revolution. There are many, many variations on that theme.
That is very prominent in their, I was going to say propaganda, but there’s probably their hate campaigns.
One other aspect that I want to raise here and that is the connection to the PFLP that’s important. What is the PFLP? Some may remember that the PFLP was involved in airplane hijackings. They were the original airplane hijackers. The Entebbe hijacking of 1976.
And even before that the hijacking of planes in 1970, and blowing them up. There are a whole series of events, including just taking machine guns and going into synagogues in Jerusalem and killing people. There are a series of terrorist events. They’re a terror organization. They are also members of the PLO. They were founded probably in the 1960s, maybe earlier, as a Marxist, revolutionary, Palestinian movement, which means they’re not Islamic, they’re not Muslims.
Most of the people who are involved in the positions of power of the PFLP are Christian. They come from Christian families. They call themselves Marxists, but they are not part of the Fatah movement, which is the main part of the PLO, but they are the Marxist liberation element and they’ve developed very close relationships, personal and political and ideological with radical Christian groups across Europe and also after that they went out to North America. So I think one of the questions is, who are their supporters and do they have those kinds of connections? We actually have those documented in Europe, less well known in Canada. But they’ve been able to build on this. And it’s not something we usually associate the Palestinian terror movements with Hamas and before that the Fatah movement with Arafat, with Muslims, fanatic Muslims who want to wipe Israel off the map. But this is a different organization and they were supported by the East Germans when East Germany existed until 1990, and the West German far-left radicals who were connected to them. That’s the type of people that get attracted to this framework.
They are revolutionaries and revolutionaries in the sense of blowing everybody up. Not distinguishing between anybody, civilians, women, children, they kill everybody. And that’s the PFLP. And this is one of their front organizations, maybe the most important front organizations. They do the political aspect. They may also be involved in recruiting. They may also be involved in planning. We don’t know that. But that’s one of the reasons Israel banned them.
EB: It’s anarchy? And the other day in Vancouver on Oct. 7, I’m sure you may have seen the video now, Vancouver police are investigating. They were desecrating and ripping up a Canadian flag. It wasn’t just Israel that they were going after and Zionists and Jews. It was also Canada. And I think that has crossed the line for people for who going after Jews in Israel wouldn’t have crossed the line.
GS: That’s part of being this radical, Marxist organization. The term sounds so 1950s and Stalinist, but a radical Marxist, Palestinian liberation organization. That’s their name. The Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine. The 1950s and 60s were filled with popular fronts for liberation of X, Y, and Z, all supported by the Communist bloc, in this case going through East Germany. Of all the organizations that the East Germans supported, one to eliminate Israel in the post-Shoah, post-Holocaust period, tells you quite a bit about that whole history.
EB: Do you have any evidence that there is Russian money, Russian support going to Samidoun people anywhere else, but also in Canada?
GS: No.
EB: We’re having our own foreign influence problems right here in Canada.
GS: Yes. And it’s possible, but it’s much more likely to be the Muslim Brotherhood with Qatar and that part of the support group. Qatar supports Hamas. Qatar is of course Al Jazeera and all the other media platforms as well. But it’s the Muslim Brotherhood that’s so central here. And that’s one part of it. And then the PFLP is the other half of that formula. By the way, there are reports, and I’ve seen the reports, there are some connections to Iran. And then the fact that Charlotte Kates got this award in Tehran makes one, I think, more than speculate that some of their funding may also come through, maybe a lot of it, comes through Iran.
EB: It walks like a duck, talks like a duck, must be a duck.
GS: So here you have the strange situation, this very weird, absurd situation where you have what are essentially Christian, Marxist, radical Palestinians being allied with the Islamic Republic of Iran. Put those pieces together and explain to me how there’s any kind of logic except for the hate. Hate of the West and hate of Israel. And the anarchy is very much part of that process.
EB: I want to bring it back to Canada because earlier this month, the Opposition leader, Pierre Poilievre, had a press conference in Ottawa on Oct. 8 and vowed to, if he is elected as prime minister, one of his priorities will be to ban Samidoun as designated as a terrorist organization. The Canadian government’s been asked to do that by B’nai Brith, by many organizations, Anthony Housefather, that’s one of his big priorities as Canada’s special representative on antisemitism. Vancouver’s Jewish community, CIJA. So many people have said it’s beyond time. What is the difficulty in your experience for a government to actually do something like that? Because if it was easy, they would have done it a long time ago. And I’m just going to put in a caveat. It took the Liberals six years to ban the Iranian Revolutionary Guard in Canada. They just did so, but it took six years.
GS: I’m going to give you a generic answer. Each country has some specific aspects which makes the process appropriate for its own legal and political system. But generally, you start by having a member, usually an appointed official–it could come from a government minister– it could also come from a member of parliament or a group of members of parliament, particularly if it’s both parties. So you have Anthony Housefather, then you have members of the Tories, including the leader, raising this issue and then getting somebody in the RCMP, the appropriate investigatory framework, to put together the evidence and to present it and reach a conclusion or a recommendation: this organization violates Canadian law in this way. Incitement to terror, support for terror, links to terror organizations, those are the questions that have to come up.
EB: For promotion of antisemitism is another one, Section 319 of the federal Criminal Code, right?
GS: Which is different from the United States where there is no specific ban on antisemitism in the legal process. But that gets to the other aspect.
EB: There’s also hate symbol legislation. There’s a whole flag thing. You can’t be displaying Nazi flags or Confederate flags. They didn’t talk about these kinds of flags, but I wonder if that’s not far off. Or Hamas, which is a designated terror organization in Hezbollah.
GS: All those questions are open questions. But there is also the issue of free speech. And that is something that is very important in the Western ideological political framework. The United States in many ways is slower and more reluctant to put limitations on organizations than Canada has been. I think that it’s pretty close, but the issue of free speech is very holy in the United States and that keeps coming up. Where does the line stop between allowing them to speak, hold rallies, which is part of free speech and crossing over into support for terrorism, incitements, and in the case of Canada, antisemitism and the other aspects of the legal process. So there’s always this balance. And then there’s the question of constituencies. I would be surprised, maybe I can be naive on this, I don’t know enough about Canadian politics, but the constituency of support for Samidoun is not the same as, in terms of Canadian politics support for Liberals, is not nearly as deep and as wide as the general support for the Palestinian cause. They are a niche terror-linked organization, and politically it should not be that difficult for a Liberal government to be able to say “This crosses our red lines”.
So you have the investigatory aspect of it, which is always done in Israel too. I think there are at least three different levels of prosecutors and officials responsible for the process in Israel to designate an organization like Samidoun as a terror linked organization. They all have to sign up on it and there has to be evidentiary processes. They don’t have to be made public, but they have to be people that can say “We looked at the evidence, our job is to do that and we are convinced.” There must be something similar in Canada. It takes somebody to start that process to say we’re going to do this, we’re going to do it seriously, and we’re not going to take six years to do it. Because then it’s meaningless.
EB: Lastly, what role, if any, did the PFLP play on Oct. 7 or is playing now? Are they mostly in the West Bank and not in Gaza, or are they both also in Gaza?
GS: The PFLP is strong, not in numbers, but in adherence, which means the terror agenda, both in Gaza and the West Bank. There were PFLP participants on Oct. 7. We have the details. We have names. We have the aspects. Some of them were killed. There was at least one case of an Israeli hostage that was held by people in the PFLP.
EB: Do you know the name?
GS: There was at least one case [Ed. note: Bibas family] where it was acknowledged. There was at least one case where Israeli forces went in and found evidence that it was a PFLP that was holding…and there were probably more. So they are very much part of that broader terrorist process. We usually attribute it to Hamas, but there were others that joined on Oct. 7.
EB: And in the West Bank, is there a constituency?
GS: They’re not a dominant organization. Again, they are a far Left non-Muslim, Christians. They do not come from the Muslim wing of the Palestinian liberation movement. But they are part of the PLO.
So the terror links are also very much cemented in that framework. And I’ll just add that when the Oslo Accords were signed in 1993 and a lot of people celebrated the beginning of peace, they [PFLP] condemned [former PLO leader Yassir] Arafat for having any kind of recognition of the Zionist entity. They did it loudly and clearly, and they sought to gain, and they probably did gain, recruits and support among Palestinians for having that position. So they’re more radical than the Fatah movement. They are the opposition in the PLO to any kind of agreement or rapprochement or recognition of Israel.
EB: Is there anything that NGO Monitor has been doing recently to send briefs or information or papers to the Canadian government to share your information and call for changes?
GS: We share our information. We update our file on Samidoun whenever there’s something new and usually every two weeks worldwide, but specifically in Canada, including Charlotte Kate’s trip to Tehran. We put it all together in one package and we send it to a very broad list to journalists, including The Canadian Jewish News and also to members of parliament, both sides. Anthony Housefather, etc.
There are more people on the Tory side who are interested in this. And government officials, anybody in Canada that’s interested, we make that information available. And to emphasize how all these pieces fit together. Usually they’ll have bits and pieces of it on their own, but to see the bigger picture, all the things we just talked about, that’s part of our role.
EB: We should do another interview on all the other groups that are operating on campus.
GS: And the Toronto {District] School Board. There’s a whole bunch of NGOs doing [things]. They’re there. They’re pushing from behind, or not so from behind.
I’m going to give you one more sentence. It goes back to the basic question that Semidun was expelled from Germany. Khaled Arakat was expelled from Germany.
His visa was not renewed. Why is it that in Canada, this process seems to be not just taking so long, but it seems like the Canadian officialdom didn’t say, “Well, wait a minute, if the Germans are banning them, then maybe there’s something that we need to look at in more detail.” Not just Israel, but the Germans as well, and other countries in Europe are also putting limitations on and opening investigations.
EB: It wouldn’t be the first time in recent weeks that the Canadian immigration departments came under fire for allowing terrorists in who claim asylum and then decide that they’re going to go and blow up Oct. 7 in Brooklyn. It’s very disturbing and disconcerting.
